Showing posts with label Laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laws. Show all posts

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Peruvian Stingless Bees Granted Legal Status

In a remote corner of the Amazon rainforest, a tiny pollinator has just gained something usually reserved for people and companies. 

Municipalities in Satipo and Nauta in Peru have approved ordinances that recognize native stingless bees and their habitat as legal subjects with rights to exist, to thrive, and to be defended in court. 










Stingless bees, also known as meliponine bees (Family: Apidae). Common genera and species include Melipona eburnea (toad's mouth bee), Scaptotrigona spp., Tetragonisca angustula, Trigona cilipes, and Geotrigona tellurica.

It is the first time anywhere in the world that an insect species receives this kind of legal status. 

These local rules sit on top of a 2024 reform passed by Congress of the Republic of Peru that brought stingless bees under formal state protection as native bees and as part of the country’s biological heritage. This is really important because these small, black bees that do not sting quietly support much of what ends up on kitchen tables. 

Researchers estimate that about half of the roughly 500 known stingless bee species live in the Amazon region, and that they help pollinate around eighty percent of tropical plant species, including cacao, coffee, avocados and many wild fruits. 

In Peru alone scientists have recorded at least 175 native stingless bee species, a number that likely undercounts the real diversity, which places the country among the world’s hotspots for these insects.

In practical terms, the Satipo and Nauta ordinances read almost like a small bill of rights for bees. The texts recognize a right to exist and prosper, to maintain healthy populations, to live in a clean and intact habitat with ecologically stable climate conditions, to regenerate natural cycles, and to receive legal representation if pollution, deforestation or new projects threaten their survival. 

 Any company, agency or individual that harms their colonies can now be sued on behalf of the bees, with courts required to consider not only human losses but damage to the species and the forest itself.

This change did not start in a legal office. It began when chemical biologist Rosa Vásquez Espinoza (right) and her team at Amazon Research Internacional were asked to analyze honey that Indigenous families were using as medicine during the worst months of the pandemic.

Their samples revealed hundreds of bioactive molecules with anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and even potential anti-cancer properties, confirming what local healers had said for generations. From there, researchers and Indigenous elders mapped colonies across large swaths of the forest, documented traditional meliponiculture, and showed how bee numbers dropped where old trees and diverse understory plants disappeared. 

For the Asháninka and Kukama-Kukamiria peoples, stingless bees are woven into stories, songs and ceremonies, not treated as simple livestock. As Asháninka leader Apu Cesar Ramos explains, within the stingless bee lives traditional knowledge handed down from grandparents and tied to the rainforest itself.

Legal experts at Earth Law Center helped turn that mixture of science and ancestral knowledge into rights-based language. Constanza Prieto describes the result as “a turning point in our relationship with nature” that makes stingless bees visible as “rights bearing subjects” instead of invisible service providers. 

The urgency is clear on the ground. Across the Amazon, stingless bees are under pressure from deforestation, land conversion for cattle and crops, heavy pesticide use, climate-stressed weather patterns and competition from Africanized honeybees that are more aggressive and can take over nest sites. Elders who once walked half an hour to find a hive now report walking for hours with no guarantee they will see one at all.

By recognizing bees as rights holders, Satipo and Nauta are required to move beyond speeches. The ordinances mandate concrete measures such as reforestation in degraded areas, strict control of pesticides and herbicides, restoration of native flora, climate adaptation plans and support for ongoing scientific monitoring. They also give communities a legal tool to challenge projects that could poison or displace colonies, from road building to new plantations. 

The ripple effect is already visible. An international petition backed by global advocacy group Avaaz has gathered hundreds of thousands of signatures that urge Peru to extend these protections nationwide, and groups in other countries are studying the model for their own wild pollinators. 

At the same time, scientists point out that safeguarding native bees also protects the wider Amazon, which stores tens of billions of tons of carbon and helps stabilize the global climate. 

For people far from the rainforest, this story ultimately circles back to daily life. The morning coffee, the chocolate bar after lunch, even that avocado toast all depend to a large extent on pollinators that seldom make the news. 

Giving legal standing to stingless bees will not, by itself, save the Amazon. It does, however, shift the legal spotlight toward the small workers that keep forests and food systems running, and invites other governments to ask a simple question. If an insect can have the right to exist, what else in nature deserves a legal voice.

Friday, November 29, 2024

Australia Passes World-first Law Banning Under-16s From Social Media

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (left) describes social media as “a platform for peer pressure, a driver of anxiety, a vehicle for scammers and, worst of all, a tool for online predators”.

And so, the country approves a law that will aim to do what no other government have, and many parents have tried to: stop children from using social media. The new law was drafted in response to what Albanese, says is a “clear, causal link between the rise of social media and the harm [to] the mental health of young Australians”. 

On Thursday, parliament’s upper house, the Senate, passed a bill by 34 votes to 19 banning under-16s from social media platforms.

The "Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024" bans social media platforms from allowing users under 16 years of age to access their services, threatening companies with fines of up to AU$50 million ($32 million) if they fail to comply. 

However, it contains no details about how it will work, only that the companies will be expected to take reasonable steps to ensure users are aged 16 or over. The detail will come later, through the completion of a trial of age-verification systems using biometrics and government IDs in mid-2025. Reportedly, the legislation will not exempt underage users with parental consent or those who already have active accounts.

The bill won’t come into force for another 12 months.

The said bill also does not specify to which companies the legislation would apply, though communications minister Michelle Rowland has said that Snapchat, TikTok, X, Instagram, Reddit and Facebook are likely to be part of the ban. YouTube will not be included because of its “significant” educational purpose, she said.

A YouGov survey released on Tuesday showed 77% of Australians backed the ban. Each of Australia’s eight state and territory leaders supports the ban, though Tasmania’s leader suggested it end at 14.

Friday, April 12, 2024

A Hate Crime Law That Divides

A ferocious debate is raging across social media, legal chambers, police stations and Scottish politics. A hate crime law was meant to protect against prejudice. It ended up sowing further division.
 
Scotland’s Hate Crime and Public Order Act came into force on April 01, 2024, a contentious law that expands existing legislation to include transgender identity as a protected characteristic from hate crimes. 
 
“We must remember why this Bill is so necessary, every day in Scotland around 18 hate crimes are committed”, Scottish First Minister – then Justice Secretary – Humza Yousaf (left) said when the act was passed back in 2021, citing the government’s estimated figures at the time. 
 
“Through the passing of this landmark Bill, Parliament has sent a strong and clear message to victims, perpetrators, communities and to wider society that offences motivated by prejudice will be treated seriously and will not be tolerated”, he exclaimed. 
 
Supporters of the law believe it will provide much-needed protection for the marginalized and regularly vilified transgender community, while critics say it will stifle free speech and even threaten hard-won women’s rights. The two sides are at loggerheads, online and offline. 
 
Before Scottish lawmakers passed the bill, laws already existed across the United Kingdom to criminalize “stirring up hatred” against racial identity. This new legislation introduces offenses for hate crimes against more characteristics, including age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity and variations in sex characteristics. 
 
Biological sex, however, is not included. The government explain this is because they intend to put a separate bill criminalizing misogyny before the Scottish parliament at a later date. 
 
According to Susan Smith (left), the director of For Women Scotland, a gender-critical feminist campaign group, this creates an “inequality” within the law. 
 
“I think for a lot of people, this idea of having certain characteristics plucked out means you elevate or you give certain people a protection that others lack”, she maintained. 
 
Another major concern for those who oppose the Hate Crime Act is the supposed lack of clarity on what type of behavior could constitute an offense under the new law. Section 3 makes it an offense to behave in a manner or communicate material “that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive” with the intention of stirring up hatred. 
 
“The test for ‘threatening’ is obviously much, much higher than the test for ‘abusive’”, Smith said. “What somebody sees as abusive varies from person to person”.
 
Those convicted under the new law could face up to seven years in prison, and/or a fine. 
 
Liverpool suffer a shock home defeat to Atalanta in the Europa League quarter-final first leg! The Serie A side properly whacked them 3-0 yesterday and tbh, the Reds were genuinely fortunate that it wasn't more. Liverpool now face a humongous battle to stick around in the second-tier competition of European club football! 
 
Gian Piero Gasperini (right) has absolutely schooled Jürgen Klopp on Thursday. An average team, in poor form, coming to Anfield and absolutely pissing all over us! 
 
For sure, this wasn't part of the script and Liverpool only have themselves to blame.
 
Home to Crystal Palace on Sunday, nothing but three points will be acceptable if we’re to stay in the title race, if we’re even to make it a race in fact. And then it’s off to Italy for the second leg and a Brobdingnagian job to do.

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

LEGO Say No to Using Minifig Heads to Obscure Suspects' Faces

In the US, getting arrested is no child’s play – except for these California cops. 
 
The Murrieta Police Department have been posting hilarious arrest and lineup photos with suspects’ faces replaced by LEGO minifig heads to comply with a new state law protecting offenders’ rights. 
 
Images on the department’s Instagram page show the LEGO blocks with a variety of facial expressions – crying, frowning, smirking or raging – digitally superimposed onto the bodies of people being busted. One appears to show two people handcuffed in the back of a squad car – with the LEGO face on one angrily looking at the other, whose toy head is crying.
 

Photos: Murrieta Police Department
 
Another shows five people in a lineup – completely unrecognizable because of the toy heads. 
 
The Photoshop-savvy law enforcement agency explained March 18 that they are shielding detainees’ faces to comply with a new state law prohibiting the release of mugshots and booking photos of those accused of nonviolent crimes. The law, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom last September and implemented on January 01, also requires police departments to remove other mugshots from social media after fourteen days.
 
The practice is nothing new for the Murrieta police: they have been obscuring suspects’ faces for a couple of years now, with emoji faces, characters like "The Grinch" and "Shrek", and yes, even "Barbie" heads.
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Posts on their social pages have included people caught stealing phones, shoplifting, taking part in drug use or sales, soliciting, or other non-violent crimes.
 
But once LEGO got wind, they put the kibosh on it. 
 
"The LEGO Group reached out to us and respectfully asked us to refrain from using their intellectual property in our social media content which of course we understand and will comply with", said Lt. Jeremy Durrant of the Murrieta Police Department.

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Chinese Lion Dance in Malaysia

Check out China's CGTN report on the Chinese lion dance in Malaysia. 
 
Originally from China, lion dance is an ancient art that has become deeply ingrained in Malaysia's multi-ethnic society. Lion dance troupes across Malaysia train tirelessly to perfect their skills, allowing them to thrill their audiences with their dazzling moves and performances. 
 
Malaysia is particularly well known for its acrobatic lion dance, and today more and more young Malaysians are getting curious to give it a try.
 
My post "Malaysia's Apex Court Strike Down 16 Provisions in Kelantan Syariah Criminal Enactment" published Sunday refers. 
 
The menteri besar of neighboring state, Terengganu, Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar says his government will examine all aspects of the state’s syariah criminal law to ensure it does not contradict federal law, as reported by FMT yesterday. 
 
[Note that Terengganu, like Kelantan, is governed by the opposition PAS].
 
A prudent move by the Chief Minister.

Sunday, February 11, 2024

Malaysia's Apex Court Strike Down 16 Provisions in Kelantan Syariah Criminal Enactment

Malaysia’s apex court have ruled that 16 Islamic laws in the northeastern state of Kelantan are unconstitutional in a landmark decision that could have major implications for the country’s legal system. 
 
By an 8-1 majority, the Federal Court ruled on Friday that the Kelantan state government did not have the power to enact the laws, on offences from sodomy to sexual harassment, possession of false information, intoxication and scale measurements, because they were already covered in civil law and were the responsibility of the federal parliament.
 
Malaysia is a federal country where states have jurisdiction over laws related to Islam, the official religion. It also operates a dual legal system where Islamic law applies to Muslims, who make up just over 60 percent of the population, in personal and family matters, as well as the practice of their religion. All other offences are handled by the civil courts. 
 
Kelantan, seen as the heartland of ethnic Malay Muslim culture, has been ruled by the opposition Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) since 1990. 
 
“The power of parliament and state legislatures are limited by the Federal Constitution and they cannot make any laws they like”, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mai was quoted as saying by Malaysia’s BFM radio as she delivered the findings of the nine-judge panel.
 
The case was brought in 2022 by Kelantan lawyer Nik Elin Zurina Nik Abdul Rashid (far left) and her daughter Tengku Yasmin Nastasha Tengku Abdul Rahman (left) after the state government passed a new set of laws on Islamic offences. 
 
The two challenged the constitutionality of 18 of the laws arguing that they were beyond the jurisdiction of the state assembly and already covered by parliament. 
 
The Federal Court did not strike down two other laws and the Chief Justice (right) stressed that the two women had not brought the case to challenge the position of Islam or the Islamic legal system. 
 
The Japan External Trade Organisation (Jetro) are expecting an increase in Japanese seafood exports to Malaysia this year in view of the boom in the tourism industry, the weak yen as well as expectations of better economic growth in the country. 
 
Based on the latest official government trade statistics from Japan, Japan exported 4.369 billion yen (100 yen = RM3.18) of marine products, such as fish, fish eggs, crustaceans and canned marine products, to Malaysia from January to December 2023, a 16 percent increase compared to the same period in 2022.
 
Malaysian media said that during an official visit by his Japanese counterpart Fumio Kishida last year, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had been reassured of the negligible radiological impact from the discharge of the treated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant and would continue importing Japanese products!
 
Sorry, I don't believe Kishida!

Saturday, August 26, 2023

A Rose That Costs A$1,878


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Australia destroyed much of its own country when it introduced rabbits from Europe in the 1800s. Rabbits "have caused great environmental damage since then", reports National Geographic. "Experts have even stated European rabbits' introduction to Australia was one of the fastest spreading instances of an invasive mammal".
 
This unfortunate decision from a couple of centuries ago is a big reason why Australia today zealously protects its environment with stringent biosecurity laws. Last weekend, a woman learned about these laws the hard way. 
 
Travel influencer Lays Laraya (right) had arrived at Perth Airport on a Qatar Airways flight from Dubai. She said the cabin crew gave her a rose, which she held in her hand as she walked through the airport. 
 
She says she was approached by plain-clothed officials who demanded to see her customs and immigration card – which all arrivals must fill in – and noted that she didn't declare the rose. That turned out to be an expensive mistake. 
 
She was fined A$1,878 for “knowingly providing false or misleading information” on an official document after mistakenly ticking that she carried no plants upon arrival to Australia. 
 
“It didn’t pass through my mind that the rose was within the category of those plants that they would be looking for”, she said. “I checked ‘no’ and that was their accusation in the end”. 
 
A spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry confirmed "all travelers coming to Australia must be aware of Australia's strict biosecurity requirements and the penalties for not complying with those requirements". 
 
The most anybody can be fined is six penalty units, or $1878, 9 News reported. "Travellers and goods arriving in Australia can introduce exotic pests and diseases", the spokeswoman said. "This could harm our health, environment and commercial industry, as such the department take all steps needed to minimise and negate these impacts. The penalty units reflect the risk level to Australia". 
 
The rose was eventually returned after it had been inspected and the stem had been cut off. 
 
Laraya says she is currently trying to appeal the fine on the grounds that other passengers with similar infringements got off with just a warning. 
 
Six penalty units for a rose. Next time, she should just stick to smuggling rabbits!

Thursday, August 10, 2023

World Bank Punish Uganda for Anti-Gay Law

On March 21, 2023, Uganda's parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2023, a law that would criminalise identifying as LGBTQ. 
 
And on May 29, the country's president, Yoweri Museveni (right) signed what has been described as one of the world's toughest anti-LGBTQ legislations into law, drawing Western condemnation and risking sanctions from aid donors. 
 
Same-sex relations were already illegal in Uganda, as in more than 30 African countries, but the new law goes further. It stipulates capital punishment for "serial offenders" against the law and transmission of a terminal illness like HIV/AIDS through gay sex. It also decrees a 20-year sentence for "promoting" homosexuality. 
 
As expected, the World Bank announced a halt to new funding for Uganda, citing the said law as the reason for the decision. 
 
“We believe our vision to eradicate poverty on a liveable planet can only succeed if it includes everyone irrespective of race, gender, or sexuality. This law undermines those efforts. Inclusion and non-discrimination sit at the heart of our work around the world”, the global financing body stated on Tuesday. 
 
Uganda's state minister for foreign affairs, Okello Oryem, accused the bank of hypocrisy, claiming that they had been "put under pressure by the usual imperialists". 
 
"There are many Middle East countries who do not tolerate homosexuals, they actually hang and execute homosexuals, in the United States of America many states have passed laws that are either against or restrict activities of homosexuality... So why pick on Uganda?" Reuters quoted Oryem as saying.

Thursday, May 25, 2023

France Bans Short-haul Flights

France has formally banned domestic flights on short routes that can be covered by train in less than two-and-a-half hours in a move aimed at reducing airline emissions and fight climate change.  

The legislation, which came into effect on Tuesday, will mostly rule out air trips between Paris and regional hubs such as Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux, with connecting flights unaffected. 

Max Boycoff, chairperson of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder, said the French law will be a test case for governments around the world. 

“While this material impact is quite minimal – only 2 percent* of global emissions come from aviation – in symbolic ways, it has a lot of purchase”, he told Al Jazeera. “The way in which this generates conversations, much like the one we’re having now, can open up further possibilities for emissions cuts elsewhere”.

[* The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) put it as 2.5 percent based on 2018 data]. 

FYI, aviation – while it often gets the most attention in discussions on action against climate change – accounts for 11.6% of transport emissions. It emits just under one billion tonnes of CO2 each year – around 2.5% of total global emissions. International shipping contributes a similar amount, at 10.6%. And rail travel and freight emit very little – only 1% of transport emissions. Other transport – which is mainly the movement of materials such as water, oil, and gas via pipelines – is responsible for 2.2%. 

The biggest culprit is said to be road travel which accounts for three-quarters of transport emissions. Most of this comes from passenger vehicles – cars and buses – which contribute 45.1%. The other 29.4% comes from trucks carrying freight. 

As Boycoff said: “Everything does count and the ways we get from place to place does matter, and transportation overall contributes to somewhere between one-quarter and 30 percent of global emissions. This demonstrates the power of climate policy action”. 

Although the measure was included in a 2021 climate law and already applied in practice, some airlines had asked the European Commission to investigate whether it was legal. 

The law specifies train services on the same route must be frequent, timely and well-connected to meet the needs of passengers who would otherwise travel by air – and able to absorb the increase in passenger numbers. 

Laurent Donceel, interim head of industry group Airlines for Europe (A4E), said governments should support “real and significant solutions” to airline emissions, rather than “symbolic bans”. A4E highlighted their own net zero by 2050 strategy, which includes switching from jet fuel to non-fossil sources and deploying battery or hydrogen-powered aircraft.

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

On Guns & Abortion

The US of A, where men are free to carry, and women are forced to! 


The US Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling on June 23, 2022 have struck down a 108-year-old New York law restricting gun-carrying rights, in their most important judgement on guns in over a decade. It expands gun rights amid a fierce national debate over the issue. 

The decision, which jeopardises similar regulations in states like California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey, is expected to allow more people to carry guns legally. Already, it is said that more than 390 million guns are owned by civilians in the US. 

And about a quarter of Americans live in states that could be affected if their own gun restrictions are challenged. 

The court found that a New York law requiring residents to prove "proper cause" – or a good reason – to carry concealed firearms in public violates the US Constitution. 

The last landmark gun decision issued by the court was in 2010, which upheld individual gun-ownership rights within homes on a national basis. 

A day later, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established the constitutional right to abortion in the US in 1973 – as well as a 1992 Supreme Court decision upholding abortion rights in a case known as Planned Parenthood v. Casey. 

The court’s ruling gives individual states the power to set their own abortion laws without concern of running afoul of Roe, which had permitted abortions during the first two trimesters of pregnancy. 

And almost half the states are expected to outlaw or severely restrict abortion as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision.

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

A 'Wake-Up Call' to the Gun Industry


On Tuesday, it was announced that gun manufacturer Remington Arms will pay $73 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit to families of victims killed in a mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, USA. It was their Bushmaster AR-15 that 20-year-old Adam Lanza had used to murder 20 first-graders and six educators on that fateful day on December 14, 2012. 

The settlement marks a rare victory for shooting victims and their families, as gun makers are typically shielded from liability when acts of violence are carried out with their products – this pertains to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, passed by Congress and signed by President George W Bush in 2005. 

“Today is a day of accountability for an industry that has thus far enjoyed operating with immunity and impunity”, said Veronique De La Rosa, whose 6-year-old son Noah was killed in the shooting. 

The settlement comes in response to a lawsuit brought by the families of nine of 26 victims of the said massacre. They accused Remington of marketing the AR-15 as a combat weapon “used for the purpose of waging war and killing human beings” and pitching their rifle to "at-risk" young men in violent video games and with bombastic, militaristic language. 

One example that was cited featured an image of a rifle along with the words "consider your man card reissued". The lawsuit alleged that the campaign formed part of a larger and "aggressive" marketing effort that included product placement in video games. 


The six-year legal battle to hold Remington accountable for selling the military-grade weapon for civilian use marks the first time a gun-maker faced liability for a mass shooting. 

Remington's decision to pay $73 million to end the lawsuit suggests the company weighed the risk of going to trial and opened its chequebook. The said sum is the full amount of coverage available from Remington's four insurers. And each family will receive a share of the settlement, but other details of the deal were not disclosed. 

In fact, Remington had offered to settle in July for $33 million – but it was rejected because the plaintiffs wanted to first prove wrongdoing by the company. Josh Koskoff, the attorney representing the families said they obtained thousands of internal company documents and conducted multiple depositions of Remington’s leadership and marketing team to do that. 

The settlement may encourage state governments and gun-control advocates who want to hold manufacturers financially responsible for gun violence to press on – offering them hope that existing legal protections won't always be an insurmountable obstacle.

Thursday, July 8, 2021

Law to Label Retouched Photos

Norway’s parliamentary legislative body, Stortinget, voted overwhelmingly – a sizeable 72 to 15 votes to pass a law that makes it illegal for influencers to share retouched photos of themselves in promotional posts on social media without disclosing that the image has been edited. 

The new requirements were passed as an amendment to the country’s 2009 Marketing Act – and is designed to fight against unrealistic depictions of beauty in an effort to curb body dysmorphia. 

In Norway, cultural discussions over unhealthy and impossible beauty standards, known as "kroppspress", has led to calls for the Stortinget to get involved. '

"Kroppspress" translates to “body pressure”, and citing a study, the Ministry of Children and Family Affairs noted that such pressure can have deleterious effects on kids and teens’ sense of self-worth. 

Under the new law, an entity that “[receives] any payment or other benefit” in regards to the post much include a standardized government label notifying users that the image has been retouched. This includes brands, companies, and influencers’ sponsored and gifted posts, and is subject to all social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Twitter. Violators of the law are subject to fines that can escalate in scale and lead to – in extreme cases – imprisonment. 

The regulations do not specify which types of retouching must be labeled; instead, a blanket label applies to any forms of body image manipulation, ranging from Instagram filters, apps like Facetune, erasing blemishes, enhancing waistlines and lips, and altering muscles or body proportions. 

The hope is the enforcement of this type of disclosure can create more clarity about where a body image being presented is fake, maybe even putting content creators and advertisers off from retouching their photos in the first place. However the Ministry does recognize that the law may be difficult to enforce since it’s not always easy to tell when an image has been edited. 

Anyway, according to local newspaper Verdens Gang, the bill has received widespread support from Norway’s influencer community – with one, in particular, arguing it should not just apply to photos of influencers, but all retouched photos posted, period.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

Hong Kong's Law and Order Chief Executive

Finally China responds to the Hong Kong quagmire – not by deploying the PLA but by enacting the National Security Act. It was approved on Tuesday by its Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. 

This piece of legislation criminalises any act of secession, subversion, terrorism or collusion with external forces that endangers national security. 

For those who fiercely oppose it can put the blame on the US for interfering in domestic politics and manipulating a segment of the population to launch a “revolution” just so to undermine China. 

And those foreign governments who have raised vociferous objections are nothing but hypocrites because they can have their own national security legislation – but not China. 

The new law comes into force on July 01, 2020 and it coincides with the 23rd anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover to China. It’s a day to celebrate its rightful return to the Chinese motherland after a century-and-a-half of British colonial rule that was viscerally humiliating.

Thursday, January 2, 2020

No-smoking Enforcement at Eateries Starts January 01

January 01, 2020 was also the first day of full enforcement of the no-smoking ruling at eateries in Malaysia. 

Five thousand personnel have been deployed by the Health Ministry and they fanned out nationwide to implement the no-smoking ruling. 

Deputy Health Minister Dr Lee Boon Chye said the ministry’s officers will be monitoring all no-smoking areas, which come under Regulation 11 (1) (d) of the Tobacco Control Regulation (PPKHT) Regulations 2004 (amended) 2018. 

He said many F&B outlets had since put up the mandatory no-smoking signs at their establishments. And added that the number of smokers in eateries had seen a drastic reduction since the government gazetted those areas as no-smoking zones from Jan 01, 2019. Enforcement is obviously needed and we know only too well that this is so necessary in Malaysia. 

In fact, it has been reported that there are still people who refuse to abide by the smoking ban at eating places. FMT had said that more than 160 smokers (and restaurant owners) were issued compound fine notices for smoking offences yesterday. 

BTW, the public too can lodge complaints or tip-offs to the Health Ministry via WhatsApp at 010 8608949 or by dialing 03 88924530. 

The info required to include details such as the name of the outlet, its address and the type of offence as well as pictures of smokers puffing away in the premises.

An investment tip for 2020:

LOL!

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

France's Digital Services Tax











On July 24, 2019, French President Emmanuel Macron signed the Digital Services Tax into law. 

As his finance minister Bruno Le Maire (right) said: “It’s in all of our interest to move toward a just taxation worldwide for digital companies”. 

This law requires tech companies to pay a 3 percent tax on revenue generated by digital services in the country – which would include companies like Facebook, Alphabet-Google, and Amazon. 

This promptly drew a rebuke from Donald Trump (left). “We tax our companies, they don’t tax our companies”, he insisted as he threatened to retaliate. 

The tax, retroactive to January, impacts companies with at least €750-million in global revenue and digital sales of €25-million in France. 

According to The Washington Post, that would affect nearly 30 companies around the world – and not just firms from the United States, but also include Chinese, German, British and French companies. 

France isn’t alone among European nations in arguing that internet companies aren’t paying their fair share into public coffers. Because they’re often domiciled in other countries – including low-tax jurisdictions, e.g. Ireland or Bermuda – and shift money seamlessly across borders, companies that sell online can easily avoid paying taxes in nations where they nevertheless make significant sales. 

France argues that the structure of the global economy has shifted to one based on data, rendering 20th-century tax systems archaic. According to 2018 figures from the European Commission, global tech companies pay a 9.5% average tax rate compared with 23.2% for traditional firms. 

While France is the first EU country to impose such a levy, it had said it would still prefer an EU-wide digital tax. 

[Note: France did push for a European Union-wide digital levy – it was scrapped when four countries: Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Ireland declined to sign off on it]. 

Now, other European countries and even Asian and Latin American countries are considering similar levies. 

If implemented, these proposals have the potential to shift billions of dollars from tech companies to local economies – and which is a good outcome to have. 

Besides, we should expect tech companies to pay their fair share of taxes because they have profited massively, given today’s digitalization of the global economy. Fair's fair!

Sunday, July 7, 2019

Avengers: Endgame Still No. 2

Seventy-one days have lapsed and Avengers: Endgame is still short of $19.15 million needed to outdo Avatar. 

I don’t think it can do it. 

As at July 05, 2019, worldwide ticket sales reached $2,768,820,792 – and to be honest, it has done very well. 

Avatar, released on December 18, 2009, ran in theaters through August – a whopping 238 days. Avengers: Endgame likely won’t stick around past July. 

And if Avengers: Endgame doesn’t make it – it’s alright because it is still the No. 2 movie of all time! 

The Peaceful Assembly Act (Amendment) 2019 Bill was passed by Parliament on Friday – after almost six hours of debate. 

The amendment, tabled by Home Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, decriminalises street protests that were originally an offence under the Act. 

Also, the right to peaceful assembly is not limited to stationary protests, but also includes processions, marches and other forms of peaceful demonstrations. 

This is all and good – but there are still restrictive provisions that must be addressed. Simply put, the Peaceful Assembly Act (Amendment) 2019 Bill did not go far enough!

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

In Singapore, Don’t Play Play!

When in Singapore, don’t play play! Not like Malaysia, everything “boleh” (can).  

The city-state is known for being super strict and strait-laced. 

I’m sure everybody knows about the chewing gum ban. The penalty for the selling of gum (with the exception of therapeutic, dental or nicotine chewing gum which can be purchased only from a doctor or registered pharmacist) is a S$100,000 fine or a prison sentence of up to 2 years. 

(But it is not as draconian as it is made out to be – it is NOT illegal to chew gum in Singapore).

There are other Don’ts too. 

You are not allowed to feed pigeons. Otherwise, get ready to pay a S$500 fine. 

You cannot be naked in your own house even – unless the curtains are drawn. Otherwise, you can be levied a S$2,000 fine, 3 months jail or both. Both being nude in public and being nude in a private place where you are exposed to the public eye are considered ‘public nuisance’ offences. 

If you play a musical instrument in a public place and someone gets annoyed – this can be an offence that includes a fine of up to S$1,000. 

If you’re caught singing ‘dirty’ (obscene songs or songs peppered with obscene lyrics) in a public place, you’ll face imprisonment of up to 3 months, a fine, or both. 

Graffiti is not considered art in Singapore. You can be arrested and caned. 

On Monday, the National Environment Agency said they fined a Singaporean S$300 after he shot two rubber bands that landed on a public road. 

The incident was labelled as littering and it happened last Thursday at Jurong East Central 1 at around noon time.


















A photo of the S$300 ticket issued by NEA for the littering offence – that was posted on social media. Image credit: Twitter/khrluffy 

NEA did explain: “We would like to remind the public that littering has environmental consequences, and keeping our environment clean by not littering is a gracious and socially responsible thing to do”.

You can’t argue with that!

Yesterday, I was at the Kelab Shah Alam Selangor in Jalan Aerobik 43 in Seksyen 13, Shah Alam, Selangor. And I was there to present my CC #8 Get Comfortable with Visual Aids speech titled The Projectile – this is for my Competent Communication award #57:














I was also a speech evaluator for a CC#10 speech – and I was voted Best Evaluator (again).