She called for more funding to small island nations on the frontlines of climate change. She added that failure to do so is "measured in lives and livelihoods".
"If our existence is to mean anything, then we must act in the interest of all of our people who are dependent on us", Mottley said.
The above illustrate the gravity of the climate emergency.
The word ecocide combines the Greek “oikos”, meaning house/home (and later understood to mean habitat/environment), with “cide”, meaning to kill. It literally means “killing one’s home”.
In legal terms, ecocide is defined as “unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by those acts”.
Criminalising ecocide would give everyone on this planet the ability to hold governments and companies to account for starting or continuing with the extraction of fossil fuels. It is said that an ecocide law could give us a fighting chance to save our future.
The target is the biggest polluters on our planet, the 20 or so companies – the Chevrons, Exxons, BPs and Shells of this world – who are responsible for a third of all carbon emissions.
If ecocide were to be criminalised, it is not only about punishing mass polluters for the damage they are causing, but also prevent the advent of new fossil fuel companies and projects. This can slow down our fossil fuel consumption as we transition to green energy. In a world where ecocide is a crime, not species but exploitative profit-driven fossil fuel companies will become extinct.
COP26 is now over, but what enforceability is there in place to prevent corporations and states from breaking commitments made? There is a gaping black hole of accountability and enforcement. A law on ecocide could just fill that hole.
I don't necessarily disagree with the above arguments. They make sense but the advocates and promoters of 'ecocide' make it such a simplistic proposition.
We forget governments must buy into it and right now, I don’t believe countries dependent on fossil fuels are ready to agree. And I’ve not begun to talk about the insidious power fossil fuel companies have over governments. The political and economic reality just won’t cut it and it won’t allow for ‘ecocide’.
The Reds weren't at their very best yesterday – but what's important is the 3 points.

