Friday, May 17, 2024
#Blockout2024
Thursday, May 16, 2024
TikTok Creators File Their Own Suit Against Divest-or-ban Law
Friday, August 11, 2023
Amazon Don't Want Workers Working From Home Too Much
Tuesday, August 1, 2023
WWF Use Twitter Bird Logo To Advocate Wildlife Conservation
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Movie Studio Marketers Rely on TikTok and Twitter
Wednesday, March 22, 2023
The “💩” Auto Response
Friday, January 6, 2023
More Tech Job Cuts
Saturday, December 10, 2022
The Twitter Files
Monday, November 21, 2022
Donald Trump's Twitter Account Is Back
Wednesday, November 9, 2022
Mass Layoffs at Meta and Elsewhere
Saturday, October 29, 2022
The Bird is Freed
Friday, October 7, 2022
Coded Language That Is Algospeak
Nonetheless, each social media platform has created a set of community guidelines to ensure a standard of behavior expected on the platform in order to create a safe space for their users.
Additionally, content moderation – actually, a euphemism for social media censorship – kicks in.
In simple terms, content moderation helps to ensure that the content published on the site is not illegal, inappropriate, harassing, or harmful to others.
Of course, social media was never a total free-for-all; platforms have long policed the illegal and obscene.
But in 2020, we began to see politically-driven action against certain types of content which has been intentionally labelled “misinformation”. This is nothing more than a pretext to prevent non-conforming content from competing with the narrative promoted by a certain government, who in turn, work with powerful allies who have control over mainstream media (and which includes compliant social media companies).
All in all, we're witnessing the expansion of categories of prohibited material as well as more aggressive actions to enforce the policies already on the books.
The above aside, content violations are unsurprisingly on the rise:
Wednesday, October 5, 2022
Elon Musk Changes Mind on Twitter Again
With his default trial scheduled less than two weeks away, Elon Musk (right) reportedly submitted a letter to Twitter on Monday stating he intends to go through with his initial offer to purchase Twitter for the previously agreed-upon price of $54.20 per share, according to a source familiar with the negotiations.
Liverpool got an easy ride in the Champions League Group A match against Rangers yesterday. They managed to earn a 2-0 victory that keeps them on course for a place in the knockout stage.
Trent Alexander-Arnold put Liverpool ahead after only seven minutes when he clipped a perfect 25-yard free-kick into the top corner. And Luis Diaz was fouled – and Mohamed Salah scored from the penalty spot in the fifty-third minute.
Interestingly, the Reds’ line up included four attacking players, with Diaz, Salah, Darwin Nunez and Diogo Jota all starting. Offensively they created multiple chances but they could only fire blanks.
The fact that they stayed in a 4-2-3-1 even when substitutes were made could suggest that they will again line up that way in the next game. We shall see.
The real litmus test for Liverpool will now come in the form of Premier League leaders Arsenal on Sunday, before a trip to Ibrox next week and then the visit of Manchester City. If the Reds can pick up positive results in all three of those games, it will suggest they have well and truly turned a corner. I hope so! I really hope so!
Friday, August 26, 2022
Twitter Queried by US Regulator
The US regulator's letter sent mid-June, but made public only Wednesday, asked Twitter to disclose their methodology as well as the “underlying judgments and assumptions” involved.
His complaint warned of obsolete servers, software vulnerable to computer attacks and executives seeking to hide the number of hacking attempts, both from US authorities and from the company’s board of directors. In particular, Zatko accused Twitter and their CEO Parag Agrawal of issuing untrue statements on account numbers because “if accurate measurements ever became public, it would harm the image and valuation of the company”.
Twitter’s official statement… is that Zatko’s report is a “false narrative” designed to damage the company.
But if Zatko’s claims are found to be credible, it could not only help Musk – who claims he abandoned his $44B Twitter purchase after they failed to provide info about fake accounts – but also mean big FTC fines. Both parties are scheduled to meet in court on October 17.
Wednesday, August 17, 2022
Google Warning Of Blood On The Streets
Certainly, things haven't been going well at Google for quite some time. The company earnings in the second quarter of 2022 were weaker than expected, as was the case with the first quarter.
And Google are warning of layoffs.
In a screenshot viewed by news website Insider, Google Cloud sales leadership threatened employees, saying there will be an "overall examination of sales productivity and productivity in general" and that if next quarter results "don't look up, there will be blood on the streets".
Employees are on edge after the company quietly extended their hiring freeze this month without making an announcement.
The economic meltdown seems to have reached many other Big Tech firms as well.
Microsoft laid off nearly 2000 employees – since July actually – possibly as a cost-cutting measure.
Other tech companies that have slowed hiring include Nvidia, Snap, Uber, Spotify, Intel and Salesforce, among others.
Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO and founder of Facebook's parent company Meta, has made it clear that the company will part ways with employees who do not perform as expected.
Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal too informed employees of a hiring freeze in a message earlier this year, citing a recent lag on growth and revenue targets.
And Cloud major Oracle are already considering laying off thousands of workers to save up to $1 billion in cost-cutting measures.
Sunday, July 10, 2022
Gentleminions On the Loose
According to the BBC, videos have gone viral online that feature these young persons who refer to themselves as ‘Gentleminions’ having descended on cinemas in big groups and cheering loudly during the screening and racking up millions of views in some cases. They seemed to be enthusiastically embracing the trend and genuinely enjoying the movie. And movie studio Universal Pictures even endorsed the trend on Twitter.
I suppose you can call this an act of performative moviegoing. TikTok users maintain it’s just for fun. And it is pertinent to point out that many groups have not caused issues.
Unfortunately, some “gentleminions” are not acting so gentlemanly and they reportedly created a ruckus and which caused several UK venues to cancel screenings and others to give huge numbers of refunds.
Some viewers and theatres had complained about the TikTok trend and were concerned about the well-being and viewing experience of younger viewers at screenings.
As per the BBC, Guernsey's only cinema had to nix further screenings of the movie, blaming "stunningly bad behaviour", including vandalism, throwing objects and abusing staff.
The Regal Cinema in Wadebridge, Cornwall, posted a notice saying it would no longer admit "unaccompanied children wearing suits" to screenings of the movie.
I guess it is just boisterous fun turning into unruly behavior – and as far as I'm aware, this is only happening in the UK?!
Elon Musk Jilts Twitter
But on Friday, he sent a letter to Twitter saying he was pulling out of the controversial deal. He had accused the company of "misleading" statements about the number of fake accounts.
This jilt is, of course, hard for Twitter to take and a court battle looms.
The consensus is that Twitter are well-positioned to win because according to Ann Lipton, a professor of law at Tulane University who specialises in corporate litigation, such merger agreements are "designed to prevent buyers from getting cold feet and deciding they want to walk away".
Musk’s lawyers also point to recent Twitter employee layoffs and hiring freezes, which they say are contrary to the company's obligation to continue operating normally.
Those arguments may be valid, but they do not merit pulling out of the deal, says Lipton, dismissing them as "nitpicky".
"It's not enough, unless he can show that the representations (about fake accounts) are not just false, but also that they dramatically call the fundamentals of the deal into question", she explains. "Looks very much like Musk is legally wrong".
The entire saga has left observers baffled by what Wedbush analyst Dan Ives described as "one of the craziest business stories ever".
As he told AFP: "I think it starts off as a circus show and it's ending as a circus show"!













































