It's laughable but a US senator wants an investigation into the next biggest national security risk to the United States: Garlic (Scientific name: Allium sativum) from China!
Methinks, he is a vampire. I can tell you, after garlic, it'll be silver and crucifixes next.
And so, Florida Senator Rick Scott wrote to the commerce secretary, alleging Chinese garlic is unsafe, citing unsanitary production methods.
China produces 75% of the world's garlic. And the US is a major consumer.
But the trade has been controversial for many years.
The US has accused China of "dumping" garlic on to the market at below-cost price.
Since the mid-1990s it has levied heavy tariffs on Chinese imports in order to prevent US producers from being priced out of the market.
In 2019, during the Donald Trump administration, these tariffs were increased.
In his letter Senator Scott (left) refers to these existing concerns. But he goes on to highlight "a severe public health concern over the quality and safety of garlic grown in foreign countries – most notably, garlic grown in Communist China".
He refers to practices which, he says, have been "well documented" in online videos, cooking blogs and documentaries, including growing garlic in sewage.
He has called for the Department of Commerce to take action, under a law which allows investigations into the impact of specific imports on the security of the US.
He argues: "Food safety and security is an existential emergency that poses grave threats to our national security, public health, and economic prosperity".
The Office for Science and Society at McGill University in Canada, which attempts to popularise and explain scientific issues, says there is "no evidence" that sewage is used as a fertiliser for growing garlic in China.
"In any case, there is no problem with this", an article "Is it true that garlic in China is grown in human feces and watered with urine?" published by the university on March 20, 2017 says.
"Human waste is as effective a fertilizer as is animal waste. Spreading human sewage on fields that grow crops doesn't sound appealing, but it is safer than you might think".
In yesterday's Premier League game between Liverpool and Crystal Palace, the former prevailed over the latter despite being a goal down in the fifty-seventh minute.
They had to wait nineteen minutes before Mohamed Salah equalised. Not exactly a well-taken goal but it was his 200th Liverpool goal – becoming only the fifth player to reach that landmark for the club, joining Ian Rush (346), Roger Hunt (285), Gordon Hodgson (241) and Billy Liddell (228).
And if you're crazy about stas, here's another one: Of those to score 50 or more for Liverpool, only Hodgson (1.56) and Luis Suarez (1.62) had a better games per goal ratio than Salah (1.64).
It was Harvey Elliott who delivered the decisive moment inside the first of 10 minutes of added time, producing a stunning strike from the edge of the penalty area to lift Liverpool above Arsenal. And they clung to their top-of-the-table position when Aston Villa beat Arsenal 1-0 on Saturday too.
To be honest, it was another pretty poor performance from Liverpool – but again and again, they seem to find a way to score when those performances occur. Liverpool fans will just have to get used to seeing the team snatch victory from the jaws of defeat this season.
According to Opta Joe on X, the Reds have now scored more winners after the 90th minute than any club in Premier League history. And it isn’t even close.
Elliott’s goal was the 43rd late winner that Liverpool have scored since 1992. That’s a full nine goals ahead of second-placed Arsenal.
Seventeen of those – or 43% – have come during Jürgen Klopp’s reign over the past eight years.